A Preface

The christians have had their time, and now their time is up, just as the pagans have had their day and they turned their light into darkness. Many allegedly claim to be christians, but not many are practicing members of the christian faith. This is because modern people are not keen to believe, as they prefer to be convinced; they're moved by knowledge rather than faith. When people base themselves upon reason and understanding, opinions and beliefs become an outdated custom.

Christians, in general, are familiar with the irrationality of faith, but to mock their own faith would be like mocking themselves. Many of them still go to church and celebrate the christian holidays, because these are their customs and this is how they were raised. And as much as it doesn't make sense to them, it makes very good sense in their hearts, since these things bring back the memories of their childhood and bring warmth to their thoughts. So as much as they might attack the christian faith, they are quick to defend mother "christianity."

But when I see christians, I'm not reminded of christianity. I simply see people, that have their own thoughts and opinions. It's not so much christianity that is the issue. When you travel around the christian nations of the world, you don't notice christianity, you notice only nationality. The nations are devoid of G-d, yet people contain the Breath of G-d within them. Humanity was Animated by G-d from the beginning, therefore christians know within them there is Something More Beyond. The only issue is that they have used this perception of G-d in order to serve their desires and thoughts, and give themselves a reason to believe the imagination of their faith.

The christian concepts of Jesus and of G-d

Most christians believe in a "holy trinity." Most of those who believe in this trinity, insist the trinity is a unity of G-d. Otherwise they would have to admit their faith in three gods, and confess that they are pagans (or polytheists). Almost all christians will tell you they believe Jesus is the son of G-d and Mary is the mother of Jesus, although she is not married to G-d--and has long been dead anyway, as is her son, Jesus. So two of the christian gods are dead, and that would leave them with One G-d. However, christians deny this fact. They claim Jesus to be a "true god," and so they say he will come back, or be reincarnated. In fact, they say he was already reincarnated long ago, a few days after his death, but then he somehow ascended to heaven.

I don't understand why they say he was reincarnated. For if he was reincarnated, then he wasn't really dead. And if he didn't actually die, then he wasn't a martyr; nobody really killed him, not the Jews and not the romans. So there's no reason to mourn his death, because according to the christians, he's not dead. However, he is also not alive, otherwise this Jesus would still be here today, but he is not. As I've already said, the christians have an excuse for this. They insist he asended to heaven, without having to die to get there. Does this mean he took his body to heaven? I don't know what the christian opinion is on that, but I don't think they have one, because nobody knows what heaven is anyhow (and if it even exists). All they know is that Jesus disappeared from the world, except they refuse to admit he's dead.

On earth, we know that when a person dies, his spirit leaves his body, and his flesh remains lifeless. The body of man is but dust and it is mortal. A body always dies, but it is said that a soul is eternal, for the spirit of man is from the Breath of G-d. However, if the christians don't believe in G-d, then all they're left to believe in is what they see--which is their body. Therefore they say Jesus is the body of a god, or the son of G-d (like hercules, that was supposed to be the son of a god).

They say Jesus was reincarnated, only because this is their basis for claiming he is a god. Since people die everyday, and people can't undo death, a person who comes back to life can be seen as a miracle in himself. However, once again, this miracle is only taken on faith, as it is not a reasonable thing. So it is important for the christians to say he not only came back to life, but then he ascended to heaven, and since then even appeared before certain people in life. This too would be miraculous, if in fact it did happen, but even then, this is no excuse for saying Jesus was a god.

Yet some christians go even further and say Jesus is "G-d." These people say there is no trinity, and Jesus was always "G-d." They say Jesus was "G-d" appearing in human form. So he is not the son of G-d anymore; to them he becomes "G-d." And when they pray to "G-d" they pray to him, and when they prostrate themselves before "G-d," they bow down to the wood of a cross. They say "G-d's" true form is the body of Jesus, and when "G-d" "Created" man in "His" "Image," "He" "Created" man in the image of Jesus. So to them, "G-d" is tranformed from the Infinite Source of His many Creations, simply to the dust of the earth; which is a very, very, limited and finite product of Creation. Therefore they don't actually believe in G-d; they just believe in Jesus. And they don't pray to G-d; they only pray to Jesus. Nor do these people believe in a "Holy Spirit;" they believe simply in the body of Jesus.

It is much easier to believe in a person, because we see that people exist. And it's much easier to pray and speak to a body, because people think they are their bodies, and because all of space (and thus the world) is composed of bodies in motion. But who was this Jesus anyway? And what did he do that was so special?

The historical figure of Jesus

To make a long story short, Jesus was a Jew who claimed he was the moshiach (which is "the anointed one" in Hebrew, as in, the king, Ordained by G-d).

Before the first Temple was built, Israel was ruled by judges and prophets, who represented G-d and spoke the Word of G-d to the people. In essence, Israel was Ruled by G-d, except the people didn't always accept G-d's Laws nor follow His prophets and the judges that judged the nation according to His Laws. In the time of the prophet Samuel, Israel demanded a king be established above them, so that they could be like the other nations, ruled by a king. This was a foolish thing to ask for since G-d is the King and G-d Will always Rule Israel. However, the prophets and judges didn't appear to have a strong enough authority, so G-d Accepted their request, and Established a kingship of men that would represent His Authority.

Through His prophet Samuel, G-d Chose Saul as the first king of Israel. But Saul failed to act in the Ways Prescribed by G-d, following the people more than he ruled them, and thus letting the people do what they wanted rather than leading them in the Ways of G-d. So G-d then Chose David as the new king of Israel. David proved to be a very good king (although he also made some big mistakes). Through David, Israel was Made into a great nation, and thus David was seen as a savior to Israel, for through him G-d Saved Israel from its own corruption and decadence, and Rescued the people from the hands of their enemies. And after David, the Temple was built in Jerusalem by his son, Solomon. Therefore, through the kingship of David, G-d Made Israel strong and influential, a great nation in the world, a great power in the region, and a Light unto the nations. Meaning, Israel behaved as the Chosen nation should.

Then, after the many kings came to rule Israel, most of them tyrants that distanced Israel from G-d rather than enforcing His Laws, Israel faced a period of tremendous decline and devastation. The first Temple was destroyed and Israel (both kingdoms) was driven into exile, as the prophets had forewarned (and foretold), but the Jews soon returned, also as had been Foretold. Seventy years after the destruction of the first Temple, the second Temple was built. But Israel was not exactly a nation of G-d. In fact, it was ruled by foreigners. Israel was rebuilt under the permission of the Persians, who occupied Israel and much of the known world. Then the Greeks conquered the Persians, and ruled Israel in their place, until Israel regained its independence under the leadership of the Maccabee family. I'm sure there were people who thought the Maccabees were like David, the saviors of Israel, as they miraculously drove out the Greeks, but their rule was not exactly a representation of G-d, and thus they didn't fulfill the prophecies for the moshiach. Instead the grandchildren of the Maccabee family fought over the succession, bringing Rome into their dispute. Thus the Maccabees brought the Romans into Israel, as Rome took control.

In the time of Jesus, rome ruled Israel, and the people despised the roman occupation and rebelled on many occasions. Many Jews thought the end had come, and they awaited the moshiach. There were doomsday cults like the essenes, that simply awaited the end, but the only nation that was doomed, was Israel. The people would revolt and fight fiercely, but the romans would brutally crush their rebellions and nail hundreds of thousands of Jews on crosses. It was a very tense period in history, and out of that came Jesus.

The Jews were very hopefull and many believed the moshiach would come to save them in that time, but they were not so gullible as to believe any person who claimed to be the moshiach was actually the messiah that was long awaited. However they were stupid in that they hoped and prayed for the moshiach rather than improve themselves, prostrate themselves before G-d, and follow His Laws--since no man can truly save Israel; only Israel can save itself and live according to G-d... As even when the Maccabees had succeeded in driving out the foreigners, nothing good came of that. But instead the Jews were confused, argued amongst themselves, and fought over G-d. There were many different sects at the time, and what was later to become christianity only began as another sect of Judaism--another interpretation of G-d's Laws, as are stated in the Torah.

And Jesus said he was this messiah. Many Jews were willing to accept that. Why not? Someone tells you he's going to save you from foreign occupation and rebuild Israel into a great nation; this is good news, if it's true. So the Jews were willing to go along with the claims of their fellow Jew, Jesus, yet nothing came of it, and many people doubted him (and rightly so).

Furthermore, the concept of this great king of Israel was anathema to rome, and it came as no surprise that rome was eager to kill any person who claimed to be this king of the Jews, thus killing the hopes and dreams of Israel, and breaking the will of a most rebellious and hard necked province in the roman empire. It is said that when the romans crucified Jesus they inscribed the words "the king of the Jews" near his crucifixion, in order to mock Israel and break its spirit. But upon the moment of his death, (if Jesus even existed) it became clear to everyone that he could not have been the moshiach, as Jesus had done nothing more than make empty claims.

There were probably many people like Jesus at the time, and there were many occasions when Jews were fooled into believing the claims of false prophets. And after Jesus, there was a big revolt. A revolt to end all revolts (although it wasn't the last revolt). At around 70 CE, after the Jews had rebelled, the romans crushed the rebellion, killing over one million people (one third of the Jews in Israel), enslaving many, driving many more into exile, and destroying Jerusalem and the Temple. That was the end of Israel (since Israel had gradually faded out of existence since then), until today, when Israel has been reborn.

So out of Jesus, there came nothing good. Rather than Redemption, Israel received destruction in such a scale as had never occurred before. Instead of becoming a great nation, Israel was scattered to the ends of the world, and became a weak and helpless people; a minority in foreign lands, without its own home and without a means of self defense. Rather than become a Light unto the nations, Israel's light has been constantly put out, its people have been ruthlessly massacred, and G-d has been buried beneath lies--for what?--in the name of Jesus, that said he would save Israel.

It is very clear to me that Jesus never accomplished anything of value and it would have been better for Israel and for the whole world had he never been born. But Jesus was not the issue and he is still not the issue today, as he will never be the issue anyway. Jesus was only a man who wanted to help his people, Israel, and bring them closer to G-d. What Jesus was and what the concept of Jesus has become, are completely at odds. And the teachings of christianity are not the teachings of Jesus, for in the time of Jesus there was no such thing as christianity. Even the so called apostles, that are said to have followed Jesus while he was alive--they weren't christians either. And not only did Jesus not intend to break the Laws of G-d, for if he did then how could he have claimed to represent G-d?...the figure of Jesus (would have) stood for G-d's Laws, and wouldn't dare disobey them, not to mention preach against them.

How is christianty connected to Jesus?

After Jesus's death, the followers of Jesus were dealt a great blow, in that they didn't know what to do next. They based everything, all their hopes and dreams, upon what Jesus had promised them--Justice and Redemption. This is similar to the case of the false messiah, Shabbatai Tzvi of the 17th century. Many Jews believed he really was the moshiach and followed him faithfully, but then he turned against G-d, and they knew he was not the one. Shabbatai Tzvi went to the Ottoman empire to demand that Israel be made into a Jewish State, but then the muslums told him they had a better idea, and that he should convert to islam or die. Rather than die he converted, and many of his followers took this as a sign that they should convert to islam and be "redeemed," and so they also converted to islam.

It is the same as today, when this Rebbe of the Chabbad Jews died, and then some members of Chabbad began to claim he was, or he "is," the moshiach. Everyone knows it's a bunch of balogny, and even though the Rabbi himself refused to say he was the moshiach, they believe so strongly that they refuse to listen to the facts and look at reality.

It is also worth noting that after the great revolt against rome, there was another revolt led by Shimeon ben Kosiba, known as Bar Kochba (son of a star). This was about a century after the time of Jesus (if Jesus even existed), and many thought Bar Kochba was the moshiach, although this time they had more of a reason to think such things. Bar Kochba fought a war against the roman empire, catching the tenth legion by surprise and retaking Jerusalem. He resumed sacrifices at the site of the Temple and made plans to rebuild the Temple. He established a provisional government and began to issue coins in its name. But then the romans crushed his revolt and killed him, and everyone knew he couldn't possibly have been the moshiach.

Yet the followers of Jesus were not so easily swayed. Like most people, they refused to accept they were wrong and that they had been fooled into believing a falsehood. Rather than accept disgrace and failure, they demanded something come of their efforts. It's true that if a person gets lost, he will refuse to admit he's lost, and will instead say he knows where he's going..."just wait and see...I'll get you back on track." It's hard to admit a mistake and accept failure; it is a big disgrace. But Israel has consistently been disgraced because of this--because it is so adamant and stubborn, even when it is wrong and has distanced itself from G-d.

Here, you've proabably heard of the "peace process" that is always in the news. It's like trying to bring a dead person back to life. Israel blows air into it, pumps it's chest as if performing cpr, screams at it, begs and pleas, prays to G-d, kisses and caresses it, and devotes its whole soul and spirit into its reincarnation, never giving up hope and never despairing even past the point of absurdity. This is Israel. It is persistent to the end, wherever it might be going and in whatever direction it might be headed. You can say this is absurd and foolish, because it is, but when Israel is headed in the right direction, this is a good trait to have.

However, those Jews who were so sure of Jesus as the moshiach, were headed towards a dead end. They knew that, because as gullible and insistant as they were, they were not stupid. So they knew they had to change some things, and make some adaptations, in order to preserve themselves and not abandon their absurd claims and their foolish faith. If they were to insist that Jesus was still the moshiach, even after he died, then they would have to give a very good reason in order to convince themselves and their followers that they hadn't been wrong. It is from this that the claims of, "Jesus will return" and "Jesus will be reborn," were made. As if to say, "perhaps Jesus is dead, but this is not his end and this is not the last you'll hear of him."

But even this was a bad excuse. For when a person dies, that is when his life ends. If you're willing to believe people can come back to life in a different form or even in the same form (which are both forms of reincarnation), then anyone and everyone can be called the moshiach. So even when the moshiach does appear, you can call this person by any name--you can even say he's your grandmother--but the truth is, that's absurd. Do you call your grandmother Jesus? And do you call your mother, father, or say people are not themselves, and are instead someone else? No! People are themselves. You can't steal a person's identity. People are, who they are.

But christianity was built upon this practice--stealing people's identity, distorting the events of their life, and saying they are what they're not--and what they never were. Thus, the figure of Jesus was turned from a person into a legend. There probably was a person called Jesus, but his followers turned him into someone else and something that he never was.

It is said that after Jesus's death, his followers established the "church" of Jerusalem. This is not so, for they were not christians. They simply established a congregation of Jews who still believed Jesus was the moshiach. And this is according to the christian records. These followers of Jesus knew him best, for they had seen him in life, and never was it their intention to go against G-d and break His Laws. On the contrary, it is said that they were observant Jews who prayed with all their hearts, and devoted themselves to the Jewish laws. While it is true that the Jews were confused, argued amongst themselves, and fought over G-d by distorting His Laws over the different schools of thought, (as is the case even today), the followers of Jesus were only unique in that they introduced a human face to their faith.

You must understand that the moshiach cannot be a god; he is nothing more than a man, as was David, and as were the other kings of Israel. When these people switched the focus from G-d to Jesus, it was considered a form of idolatry. Instead of saying G-d would Save and Redeem Israel, as G-d Rules Israel and is the Only King of Israel and of the whole universe, they said Jesus would return to save them and would become the king of Israel, although he was dead. Therefore, the Jews thought there was something strange going on, and they said (rightly so) that the followers of Jesus were trying to lead Israel away from G-d. So they sent people to investigate this new sect, that later came to be christianity. According to the christians, one of the people they sent to investigate, was Saul, who later came to be known as Paul.

It is said that Saul had some sort of an "epiphany," and suddenly came to believe Jesus was the moshiach. This is the point in the story when the facts got distorted and reality was sensationalized into something very similar to greek mythology. Instead of working against this new sect of Judaism, Saul, or Paul, took over and began changing everything to his liking. The followers of Jesus had many arguments with Paul and didn't like what was becoming of their movement, because, don't forget, they were still Jewish, and to them, Jesus was still only a person, although they thought very highly of him and said he would return from the dead and become the king of Israel. But never did they preach against G-d and His Laws, otherwise there would have been no point in talking about any moshiach, since the whole purpose of the moshiach is to establish the Rule of G-d upon Israel, and to some extent, upon mankind.

But Paul was not into quality, he was more interested in quantity. Paul was willing to change anything, as long as people would follow him. It is said that first he tried to preach to the Jews, yet the Jews would not listen. Then he gave up, and went abroad, establishing missionaries in other lands. But Paul was having a hard time, because why would anyone care about this Jesus who was supposed to save Israel, when these people belonged to other nations, and to them, Israel was a foreign nation? So Paul pleaded with the followers of Jesus to allow him to make some very big changes, but they were not willing to go along with this, as these changes went against G-d's Laws. So Paul broke away from the followers of Jesus and established his own movement. Therefore, the followers of Jesus never actually became christians, and instead blended back into mainstream Judaism, and forgot about their dangerous affair with the man they called Jesus.

So Paul was the founder of christianity, Paul invented the character of Jesus, and Paul was the one who created a new religion. All the people before Paul were Jewish, and Paul was the one that broke away from Judaism and created the whole story of christianity. So I don't understand why christians pray to Jesus, when they have Paul to thank for their beliefs and their religion. Except that Paul used the character of Jesus to further his aims, and thus retained some aspects of Judaism in the new religion that was named christianity. It is important to note that christianity is based to a very large degree upon Judaism, and everything written in the christian books is based to some extent on the Hebrew Bible (the Tanach). Because of that, Paul couldn't claim he was a god, since everything was built upon Judaism and Jesus as the moshiach. Besides, if Paul said he was a god, nobody would have believed him.

How did Paul manage to convince the pagans that Jesus was a god?

The pagans believed in gods, so convincing them that some figure could be a god, was a very simple task. The pagans believed in thousands of different gods. Every new concept became a god in their eyes, and every new form was worshiped as a god. For someone to come and say, "I believe in other gods," was a standard thing. And pagans had many different religions, all with their own customs and practices. Switching from one religion to another was a very simple task. All they had to do was accept a new set of gods and practice a new list of customs. It was like a party to them. Like switching a mask and trying a new game. Nothing was really serious or sacred, that was involved with gods. For what are gods? They are mere wood and rocks.

The only thing that annoyed the pagans was when someone said there is Something Better than these gods, and there is some Form of Truth Beyond. Pagans don't like these kinds of claims, because it means they are wrong, and it makes them look bad. Perhaps their faiths are meaningless and empty, but at least it gives them freedom, for they say they are free to do whatever they want. When someone said "there Is A G-d and He Wants you to follow His Laws," this bothered them, because it makes sense and it was hard to deny, yet that meant they would have to change their ways, judge themselves, and submit to the Judgement of G-d. They were willing to accept that there's One G-d, but they weren't willing to accept His Laws.

It's very easy to believe in G-d, because G-d is impersonal and doesn't seem to be involved at all. Anyone can say, "fine, I believe in G-d, now don't bother me anymore." But believing in G-d doesn't mean anything if you don't follow His Laws. G-d didn't Flood the world and Destroy all evil because people refused to believe in Him. G-d didn't Set certain Laws over Noach and his children because these Laws would benefit Him. G-d didn't Promise to Make Abraham into a great nation simply because Abraham believed in Him. There have been many people who believed in G-d; even since the time of Adam people have always known there is a G-d. But these were not necessarily good people; they were mostly corrupt and evil. When G-d Appeared before Moses on Mount Sinai, Gave him the Ten Commandments, and Instilled the Torah within him and within his thoughts (that Moses then wrote down over the years, by G-d's Command), G-d wasn't trying to please Himself and gain control of mankind...G-d was trying to Teach mankind and make the world that He Created, a better place for His Creations. Therefore, G-d's Laws are not for G-d, they are for mankind. And man achieves nothing by believing in G-d, when mankind does not follow His Laws.

When Paul preached to the pagans, they told him, "you're right...perhaps there is a G-d, but we don't want to follow His Laws." The pagans were familiar with Israel and they were very familiar with G-d's Laws. Don't forget that Israel had been in existence for about 1600 years before the time of Jesus. So when Paul came to them, he spoke of nothing new. The pagans knew they were wrong, and thus they were willing to hear him out. First Paul tried to tell them that G-d is the G-d of Israel and of the whole universe, and His Laws are a Blessing for mankind that should be kept, and must not be broken. And he told them Jesus was the moshiach who was going to save Israel and make it into a great nation, a Light unto the nations, so that all the gentiles would know G-d and they would uphold His Torah. But the pagans were not willing to hear that, and I'm sure they expressed their thoughts very clearly. So Paul was willing to change some things to suit them, and he changed many things and formed a new religion; a mix of paganism and Judaism.

What exactly did Paul change?

Paul changed many things about Judaism. The most important change was that he threw away G-d's Laws and made up his own rules. The rules Paul made were those of faith, and not so much of action. To christianity, practice is not an isssue as much as is faith. Paul said that to be a christian, the pagans would have to convert. In fact, according to christianity every person is a pagan at birth and they must be converted by purifying themselves with a baptism (which was and is called a mikvah by the Jews), which is absurd. To the contrary, every child is born of G-d, in that children don't know any more than what they were Given. It is in life that people have the choice to either turn from G-d or seek His Truth.

This is another central belief in christianity. Christians say people are evil and they were born evil, since from the beginning man had sinned. This is absurd, since people are born with a clear conscience. Children are pure and innocent. It is in the course of their lives that they choose either evil or good. And the Torah Given to mankind is there to help us understand what good is, and what our role is in the world. Thus the Laws of G-d were Given to the world in order to make people good. But the christians rejected G-d's Laws from the start, and thus they welcomed evil into their hearts.

But there is a contradiction in this, since Paul brought the Torah to the pagans, and said that one of the precepts of faith in his new religion was that the Torah was Given to mankind by G-d. However, he also said G-d "changed" His "Mind," and no longer wanted people to follow His Laws, even though the Torah in itself means "Instruction" or "Law," and the whole point of the Torah is to follow G-d and uphold His Laws. This can be viewed in two ways: Either Paul was an idiot and a weakling who allowed himself to be converted by the pagans rather than converting them, or else he was treacherous and hopeful of his treacherous plan. Perhaps Paul just wanted the pagans to accept the Torah at any means, so that once they had the Torah and read it sincerely, they would understand the importance of G-d's Laws, and would bring themselves closer to G-d.

On the issue of Jesus... Paul's mission was to spread the word that Jesus was this moshiach that was going to lead Israel in G-d's Ways and make Israel into a great nation, and thus all the nations would follow Israel's lead and bring themselves closer to G-d. But the pagans were not willing to accept this, since they didn't want to get their loyalties mixed up. They were not Israel, so why would they want Israel to be raised above them, that they should follow in Israel's lead? Paul was aware of that, because he figured it out the hard way, by trial and error. So he told them instead that Jesus was the son of G-d, born of a virgin mother, that was fertilized by G-d. This sounded more interesting to the pagans, and it was to their liking, since it's an entertaining story, and brings G-d down to their level, making "Him" a god.

But when you look at this a second time, you can ask yourself a question: What is a son of G-d? Does this mean G-d is a person, who has children? But of course, G-d doesn't have a body. He is not flesh. G-d is not the dust of His Creations. G-d Is Infinite, He Is Eternal, All Knowing, and Almighty. G-d is the King of the universe, and everything in existence is a product of Creation--G-d's Creations. So it is an inherant Truth that the G-d of Creation Is the G-d That Created everything, including Jesus, Mary, and everyone else that ever existed, everyone that exists, and all that will exist. And what is a child? It is a product of his parents. What are people? They are a product of G-d. Therefore, people are in essence G-d's children.

So Jesus was said to have been the son of G-d and Mary the virgin, just as christianity was a product of the Tanach and paganism. In this trinity of the christians you see a story of christianity. The pagans were married to Israel, by Paul, but their marriage was never completed. Yet they did have a child, and that was christianity. But rather than say christianity was the bastard child of paganism, it was said that the child was pure, for it had been born of a "pure" mother (and because children are born pure). But everyone knows that paganism was not pure, just as Mary was not a virgin. And the pagans never really had an affair with Israel, they simply masterbated with their thoughts. Likewise, Mary was never fertilized by G-d, she simply bore a child who thought he represented G-d.

This is my interpretation of christianity, and it is very likely that Paul played a big role in its creation and compilation. There is yet some intelligence to be found in it all. Perhaps Paul tried to outsmart the pagans. Perhaps his intention was to fool them. But in the end, the pagans got the upper hand, and turned the whole picture upside down. In reality it was not Paul's story, and the story continued the way it had begun. It had a corrupt beginning, and thus it led a corrupt life, although it need not end in corruption.

As the christians like to say, "the Truth will set you free." Perhaps in the end, the story will fix itself, and christianity will mend its faults and embrace the One True G-d. Because even though christianity was not exactly born in purity, every person is born pure and innocent. And although christianity has not led a pure life, this doesn't mean christians cannot be good, for every person has two inclinations; one of good and one of evil. People decide the course of their lives, and thus the christians will decide their future. A child is born pure, and may it be G-d's Will that this child will lead a pure life and embrace the Word of G-d as is Taught in the Tanach. For I have no doubt this Is the Will of G-d.